<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flawed red light camera logic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/02/24/flawed-red-light-camera-logic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/02/24/flawed-red-light-camera-logic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/02/24/flawed-red-light-camera-logic/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 22:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/02/24/flawed-red-light-camera-logic/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>since you're following this:
even though our blog has generally been anti red light cameras, i've been openly skeptical of cliff clark's "methods" to get the message out. now my teddy bear post is drawing hostile and obscene anonymous comments from someone impersonating clark/clark. i addressed this in our latest post, check it out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since you&#8217;re following this:<br />
even though our blog has generally been anti red light cameras, i&#8217;ve been openly skeptical of cliff clark&#8217;s &#8220;methods&#8221; to get the message out. now my teddy bear post is drawing hostile and obscene anonymous comments from someone impersonating clark/clark. i addressed this in our latest post, check it out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
