2 Comments to 'Standing up for wrongly accused babydaddies everywhere'
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Standing up for wrongly accused babydaddies everywhere'.
:: Trackbacks/Pingbacks ::
No Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Standing up for wrongly accused babydaddies everywhere
Posted By katie allison granju
Campfield proudly announces that his bill - which he himself dubs the “Not the Baby Daddy Bill” - is back:
I had a bill this last year to make it possible to allow people who find out through DNA testing that they are not the biological parent of a child to stop making future child support payments on said children.
Glad to see Sen. Campfield continues to find creative avenues for his seemingly boundless legislative energies.
It is curious to me, however, how much of his work seems to be related to matters of human sexuality, something a lawmaker who espouses limited government might reasonably believe generally falls outside the purview of said smaller government.
Mar 18th, 2008
Campfield’s bill covers only those daddies who claim they’ve been duped into fatherhood? Didn’t Rep. Hardaway introduce a bill requiring paternity test to be performed on ALL babies before the fathers’ names could be listed on the birth certificates? If so, when you compare the bills side by side, Stacey’s seems sane… at least saner.
Wow, that is a sentence I never imagined myself writing.
How is saying that the government shouldn’t be able to compel you to pay for children that are not yours not consistent with a belief in limited government? And what does any of this have to do with sexuality?