<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Single mothers lead us down the slippery slope to socialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 23:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>Katie-I'm sorry Ned posted this non-relevant comment on this site.  He submitted the same comment on mine, and I tried to contact him, but he left a phony email address.

If there are links on my site, I am unaware.  I contacted my site administrator and he'll be going over it tonight and said that he'll update any software if there are problems.

But as far as "monetizing" my visitors, that's an unfounded accusation.  I intentionally don't have advertising on my site because I want my commentary to stand by itself and not be clouded by the idea that I'm only driving numbers.

I have a great audience on my site.  If there are embedded links, then no doubt there are those with greater computer knowledge than I that have sought to take advantage of my traffic and my technological deficits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie-I&#8217;m sorry Ned posted this non-relevant comment on this site.  He submitted the same comment on mine, and I tried to contact him, but he left a phony email address.</p>
<p>If there are links on my site, I am unaware.  I contacted my site administrator and he&#8217;ll be going over it tonight and said that he&#8217;ll update any software if there are problems.</p>
<p>But as far as &#8220;monetizing&#8221; my visitors, that&#8217;s an unfounded accusation.  I intentionally don&#8217;t have advertising on my site because I want my commentary to stand by itself and not be clouded by the idea that I&#8217;m only driving numbers.</p>
<p>I have a great audience on my site.  If there are embedded links, then no doubt there are those with greater computer knowledge than I that have sought to take advantage of my traffic and my technological deficits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1639</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1639</guid>
		<description>Terry: Why won't you answer the question? Why do you have so much hidden embedded spam on your site? (view page source to see how that site is 'monetizing' its visitors, making money off each one by linking to all kinds of other spammy ringtone sites)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry: Why won&#8217;t you answer the question? Why do you have so much hidden embedded spam on your site? (view page source to see how that site is &#8216;monetizing&#8217; its visitors, making money off each one by linking to all kinds of other spammy ringtone sites)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1638</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1638</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Read Terry's response in comments. There is no demonization of the single parent there, nor was there in her original post. As for the legislature's "Papa State" mindset, the fact that the constituents of the legislature are seemingly stable moms and dads is not relevant. The fact that government inherently seeks power and centralized control over anything and everything is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Read Terry&#8217;s response in comments. There is no demonization of the single parent there, nor was there in her original post. As for the legislature&#8217;s &#8220;Papa State&#8221; mindset, the fact that the constituents of the legislature are seemingly stable moms and dads is not relevant. The fact that government inherently seeks power and centralized control over anything and everything is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe P.</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1629</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1629</guid>
		<description>hoo boy. what's her next post "How Fluoridated Water Turns You Into A Socialist Commie?"

and just how does American society downplay the 'importance of family'? is there some secret hidden message in some barely-viewed TV sitcom which is brainwashing the nation? by far, a two-parent family has the most advantages in our society.

perhaps some of the reasons families get 'broken' is that society rushes folks to get married for all the wrong reasons, and divorce is the remedy most sought for. and let's remember this 'Papa State' mindset is created in legislatures nationwide by seemingly stable moms and dads who are elected to office.

our society does send a lot of mixed messages, certainly, but demonizing single parents or praising a dysfunctional family simply for staying together solves nothing. 

maybe Frank needs to go back to insulting the governor for his choice of Christmas cards and leave the social engineering to someone else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hoo boy. what&#8217;s her next post &#8220;How Fluoridated Water Turns You Into A Socialist Commie?&#8221;</p>
<p>and just how does American society downplay the &#8216;importance of family&#8217;? is there some secret hidden message in some barely-viewed TV sitcom which is brainwashing the nation? by far, a two-parent family has the most advantages in our society.</p>
<p>perhaps some of the reasons families get &#8216;broken&#8217; is that society rushes folks to get married for all the wrong reasons, and divorce is the remedy most sought for. and let&#8217;s remember this &#8216;Papa State&#8217; mindset is created in legislatures nationwide by seemingly stable moms and dads who are elected to office.</p>
<p>our society does send a lot of mixed messages, certainly, but demonizing single parents or praising a dysfunctional family simply for staying together solves nothing. </p>
<p>maybe Frank needs to go back to insulting the governor for his choice of Christmas cards and leave the social engineering to someone else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1624</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1624</guid>
		<description>Oops, Sorry.  I must have clicked the submit twice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, Sorry.  I must have clicked the submit twice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1622</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1622</guid>
		<description>Missbw and Katie: You personalize the issue too much.  I said broken families, not single mothers. 

My point isn't to say that a single mother, or a single father, can't do a great job of raising a child.  My point is that society has downplayed the importance of family.  They have done so in both cultural messages and in public policy.

The bottom line is that statistics bear out time and time again that whether we look at poverty, crime, sexual activity, drop out rates, etc., it all goes back to family and the two parent home.

Can a single mother or single father beat the odds and do a successful job?  Absolutely.  But the reality is that most don't.  

Look at the sad state of our urban centers and the fatherless youth there.  We've got a problem and the upper echelons of society do no favors by downplaying the importance of a two parent home to those who are least able to afford the downside of going at the very difficult job of parenting alone. 

It may seem like oversimplification, and maybe it is.  Two parents yield the best results and our policies and societal messages should support, not harm, that goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missbw and Katie: You personalize the issue too much.  I said broken families, not single mothers. </p>
<p>My point isn&#8217;t to say that a single mother, or a single father, can&#8217;t do a great job of raising a child.  My point is that society has downplayed the importance of family.  They have done so in both cultural messages and in public policy.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that statistics bear out time and time again that whether we look at poverty, crime, sexual activity, drop out rates, etc., it all goes back to family and the two parent home.</p>
<p>Can a single mother or single father beat the odds and do a successful job?  Absolutely.  But the reality is that most don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Look at the sad state of our urban centers and the fatherless youth there.  We&#8217;ve got a problem and the upper echelons of society do no favors by downplaying the importance of a two parent home to those who are least able to afford the downside of going at the very difficult job of parenting alone. </p>
<p>It may seem like oversimplification, and maybe it is.  Two parents yield the best results and our policies and societal messages should support, not harm, that goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1623</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1623</guid>
		<description>Missbw and Katie: You personalize the issue too much.  I said broken families, not single mothers. 

My point isn't to say that a single mother, or a single father, can't do a great job of raising a child.  My point is that society has downplayed the importance of family.  They have done so in both cultural messages and in public policy.

The bottom line is that statistics bear out time and time again that whether we look at poverty, crime, sexual activity, drop out rates, etc., it all goes back to family and the two parent home.

Can a single mother or single father beat the odds and do a successful job?  Absolutely.  But the reality is that most don't.  

Look at the sad state of our urban centers and the fatherless youth there.  We've got a problem and the upper echelons of society do no favors by downplaying the importance of a two parent home to those who are least able to afford the downside of going at the very difficult job of parenting alone. 

It may seem like oversimplification, and maybe it is.  Two parents yield the best results and our policies and societal messages should support, not harm, that goal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Missbw and Katie: You personalize the issue too much.  I said broken families, not single mothers. </p>
<p>My point isn&#8217;t to say that a single mother, or a single father, can&#8217;t do a great job of raising a child.  My point is that society has downplayed the importance of family.  They have done so in both cultural messages and in public policy.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that statistics bear out time and time again that whether we look at poverty, crime, sexual activity, drop out rates, etc., it all goes back to family and the two parent home.</p>
<p>Can a single mother or single father beat the odds and do a successful job?  Absolutely.  But the reality is that most don&#8217;t.  </p>
<p>Look at the sad state of our urban centers and the fatherless youth there.  We&#8217;ve got a problem and the upper echelons of society do no favors by downplaying the importance of a two parent home to those who are least able to afford the downside of going at the very difficult job of parenting alone. </p>
<p>It may seem like oversimplification, and maybe it is.  Two parents yield the best results and our policies and societal messages should support, not harm, that goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missybw</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1620</link>
		<dc:creator>Missybw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/04/15/single-mothers-lead-us-down-the-slippery-slope-to-socialism/#comment-1620</guid>
		<description>As usual, oversimplification of a very complex issue.  I try not to take on people who "ann coulter" the conversation.  Especially people who've never walked in the Payless Shoes of a single mother, doing the best she can.  Nothing is as simple as conservatives try to break it down to.  Nothing.  And, like my Papaw used to say, it's like trying to teach a pig to dance.  You only end up looking foolish and the pig gets mad when you end up leading.  

Signed, the proud and very independent daughter of a Single Mother who worked her tail off to ensure that I never suffered because of her personal choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, oversimplification of a very complex issue.  I try not to take on people who &#8220;ann coulter&#8221; the conversation.  Especially people who&#8217;ve never walked in the Payless Shoes of a single mother, doing the best she can.  Nothing is as simple as conservatives try to break it down to.  Nothing.  And, like my Papaw used to say, it&#8217;s like trying to teach a pig to dance.  You only end up looking foolish and the pig gets mad when you end up leading.  </p>
<p>Signed, the proud and very independent daughter of a Single Mother who worked her tail off to ensure that I never suffered because of her personal choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
