No Comments! Be The First!
One man’s animal abuse is another man’s solution to dog problems
Let me be clear before saying what I’m about to say that I am in no way in favor of real, honest to goodness animal abuse. But having grown up on a farm in a rural community in Middle Tennessee, I tend to come down on the side of state legislator Frank Buck in the debate that Tom Humphey (who happens to reside in the same, small rural community where I grew up) chronicles in his column today.
In the piece, Humphrey points out an urban-rural divide in the debate over what constututes “abuse,” with farm-community legislators making the case that sometimes rural life requires a firmer hand with the critters than is required in a West Knoxville dog grooming shop.
I also wonder whether the folks who seem to want to stigmatize the way farmers handle livestock ever eat meat or wear leather. Because if you really have a problem with “animal abuse,” the best place to focus your efforts on ending it would be the horrific large-scale, factory farming practices that are quickly replacing the small farm approach to livestock management that Tennessee’s rural communities have had as part of their culture for several centuries.

