One Comment to 'Creationist convergence'
Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'Creationist convergence'.
:: Trackbacks/Pingbacks ::
No Trackbacks/Pingbacks
Creationist convergence
Posted By katie allison granju
Via Joe Powell, I learned that there is a get-together for creationists taking place in Greeneville this week, with speakers and such:
Noting that the Earth’s surface was first covered with water, and still is very substantially covered by water, he said that evolutionists in the scientific field have trouble explaining how such vast quantities of water got to the Earth.
Further, he contended that, “In evolution we have no transitional forms between one species and another.”
White stated that three of the best evidences for God, and design, or Creation, are:
* the existence of the unlikely or unexpected;
* the evidence of purpose;
* complexity.
As for evolution, the scientific case “is weak,” and often shifting, Wright said.
Apr 30th, 2008
ok, first thanks for the linkage — but you cited a comment by Dr. White which just floored me when i read it because it just plain false. he surely can hold true what he wishes, and promote it as the best view — but the claim that science has no proof of transitional forms simply is not factual.
here’s one list of them:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CC/CC200.html
and also
and here too:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html