<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The post-feminist future is now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 15:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2354</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2354</guid>
		<description>At LONG LAST we have found the racists!
It's......

The blacks!!!!!

You have to be pretty stupid to claim to have NO CLUE why 92% of black voters would back Obama.

You seriously do not know?

In the 200 plus years this country has been in existence, when--EVER--has there ever been a remote chance of there being a black president?

Considering the history of the country, the way blacks have fared in the electoral process and decades of people addressing that stupid question about whether or not America is "ready" for a black president ("Do you think "other people" are racist?"); here comes a candidate out of the shadows (he is half-white, but historically who are we kidding with respect to what whites think about this?) with a chance of a lifetime, and you expect the African-American population to yawn?

You must be "really" wondering!?

You guys are in some serious denial. But then again, if you've never seen "white privilege"...

If the price of slavery and a "couple thousand" lynchings is that blacks get excited over the first possible black president in 200+ years (and God forbid they actually get excitd over that), then you should be thanking God that the "debt" has been "canceled" (so to speak).
(The funny thing is that he did not get 90% of the black vote until blacks were convinced that whites would support him.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At LONG LAST we have found the racists!<br />
It&#8217;s&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>The blacks!!!!!</p>
<p>You have to be pretty stupid to claim to have NO CLUE why 92% of black voters would back Obama.</p>
<p>You seriously do not know?</p>
<p>In the 200 plus years this country has been in existence, when&#8211;EVER&#8211;has there ever been a remote chance of there being a black president?</p>
<p>Considering the history of the country, the way blacks have fared in the electoral process and decades of people addressing that stupid question about whether or not America is &#8220;ready&#8221; for a black president (&#8221;Do you think &#8220;other people&#8221; are racist?&#8221;); here comes a candidate out of the shadows (he is half-white, but historically who are we kidding with respect to what whites think about this?) with a chance of a lifetime, and you expect the African-American population to yawn?</p>
<p>You must be &#8220;really&#8221; wondering!?</p>
<p>You guys are in some serious denial. But then again, if you&#8217;ve never seen &#8220;white privilege&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>If the price of slavery and a &#8220;couple thousand&#8221; lynchings is that blacks get excited over the first possible black president in 200+ years (and God forbid they actually get excitd over that), then you should be thanking God that the &#8220;debt&#8221; has been &#8220;canceled&#8221; (so to speak).<br />
(The funny thing is that he did not get 90% of the black vote until blacks were convinced that whites would support him.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: py</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2347</link>
		<dc:creator>py</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2347</guid>
		<description>my point was not to suggest racism, people off all color can be racist yes even brown. If we're labeling ourselves I am in a mixed-race marriage racism most certainly exists on both sides of the coin!
And no not all black people will vote for Obama. Not all black people voted for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton. Not all Catholics voted for JFK. Not all republicans voted for Bush my point is people can vote for who they want regardless of gender, race or party. Are people not allowed to vote on issues or follow their conscience any longer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my point was not to suggest racism, people off all color can be racist yes even brown. If we&#8217;re labeling ourselves I am in a mixed-race marriage racism most certainly exists on both sides of the coin!<br />
And no not all black people will vote for Obama. Not all black people voted for Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton. Not all Catholics voted for JFK. Not all republicans voted for Bush my point is people can vote for who they want regardless of gender, race or party. Are people not allowed to vote on issues or follow their conscience any longer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 04:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2343</guid>
		<description>Mitch said
"Funny, but this might be the first time NARAL has considered viability to be a meaningful criterion for anything."To take
That was awesome, nice job. The truth hurts.
Zain said said on May 14th. “all blacks are not voting for Obama”. 90+% of blacks voting for Obama is not racist????? 
I love how this is ignored by the monolithic dying press.  I still cannot understand how they talk about racism in WV with 60% when a constant 90+% is pretty obvious for all "black" voters for the 'Bama.
And btw, I live in San Francisco for all you "East Tennessee "  labelers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch said<br />
&#8220;Funny, but this might be the first time NARAL has considered viability to be a meaningful criterion for anything.&#8221;To take<br />
That was awesome, nice job. The truth hurts.<br />
Zain said said on May 14th. “all blacks are not voting for Obama”. 90+% of blacks voting for Obama is not racist?????<br />
I love how this is ignored by the monolithic dying press.  I still cannot understand how they talk about racism in WV with 60% when a constant 90+% is pretty obvious for all &#8220;black&#8221; voters for the &#8216;Bama.<br />
And btw, I live in San Francisco for all you &#8220;East Tennessee &#8221;  labelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zainuddin</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2341</link>
		<dc:creator>Zainuddin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2341</guid>
		<description>Py said on May 14th. "all blacks are not voting for Obama". 90+% of blacks voting for Obama is not racist?????  By the By you can't accuse me of being racist.  I am brown not white so obviously I cannot be racist.  Same immunity as the blacks.  Additional immunity is conferred by being part of a very small minority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Py said on May 14th. &#8220;all blacks are not voting for Obama&#8221;. 90+% of blacks voting for Obama is not racist?????  By the By you can&#8217;t accuse me of being racist.  I am brown not white so obviously I cannot be racist.  Same immunity as the blacks.  Additional immunity is conferred by being part of a very small minority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitch</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2340</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 02:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2340</guid>
		<description>Funny, but this might be the first time NARAL has considered viability to be a meaningful criterion for anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, but this might be the first time NARAL has considered viability to be a meaningful criterion for anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Kidder</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2338</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Kidder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2338</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  Both Barack Obama and Hillarity are pro-choice.  NARAL  must really believe that Hill CANNOT get the nomination so, in effect, they are just backing the winning horse rather than voting with their conscience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  Both Barack Obama and Hillarity are pro-choice.  NARAL  must really believe that Hill CANNOT get the nomination so, in effect, they are just backing the winning horse rather than voting with their conscience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aulder Guy</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>Aulder Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>Not being from the area originally, I have always been amazed at how East Tennesseans accuse anyone who disagrees with them as being a radical leftist.  I have always been equally amazed at how East Tennesseans are "running dog lackies" for the Republican Party---in an almost mindless way.  This must be the only area of the country that can claim to be staunchly Republican because, as the song goes, "grandpa...voted for Eisenhower 'cause Lincoln won the war."  And really, just think about it for a minute, when it is possible to have a community and be neighborly with your neighbors, East Tennesseans behave as if they still live alone in a log house, their nearest neighbor is 20 miles away in another valley that is an inconvenient hike away, and (because of it) they can say... "By golly, I am alone here.  The survival of me and my family is all up to me and my total personal responsibility (catch that Republican thing there) because I am basically all alone in this world.

To be honest about, this Middle Tennessee person (born and raised) despises this lame East Tennessee cultural legacy.  While everyone else's ancestors moved west, population density increased, and people finally realized that when you are elbow-to-elbow with other people, you cannot define "freedom" as the ability to do whatever you want, wherever you want, and whenever you want---no matter who gets hurt.  C'mon all you "personal responsibility" East Tennessee Republicans who will thoughtlessly vote for John McCain simply because of Parson Brownlow, let's hear it.  How about a rousing, " I should be able to smoke in any restaurant. They've taken my freedom away."

No they haven't.  They have informed you that you do not live in an isolated mounatin valley.  You live around other people.  You have a personal responsibility to think not just about yourself but also about your elbow-to-elbow neighbors who would like to avoid cancer.



For example, I should be able to smoke in restaurants</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being from the area originally, I have always been amazed at how East Tennesseans accuse anyone who disagrees with them as being a radical leftist.  I have always been equally amazed at how East Tennesseans are &#8220;running dog lackies&#8221; for the Republican Party&#8212;in an almost mindless way.  This must be the only area of the country that can claim to be staunchly Republican because, as the song goes, &#8220;grandpa&#8230;voted for Eisenhower &#8217;cause Lincoln won the war.&#8221;  And really, just think about it for a minute, when it is possible to have a community and be neighborly with your neighbors, East Tennesseans behave as if they still live alone in a log house, their nearest neighbor is 20 miles away in another valley that is an inconvenient hike away, and (because of it) they can say&#8230; &#8220;By golly, I am alone here.  The survival of me and my family is all up to me and my total personal responsibility (catch that Republican thing there) because I am basically all alone in this world.</p>
<p>To be honest about, this Middle Tennessee person (born and raised) despises this lame East Tennessee cultural legacy.  While everyone else&#8217;s ancestors moved west, population density increased, and people finally realized that when you are elbow-to-elbow with other people, you cannot define &#8220;freedom&#8221; as the ability to do whatever you want, wherever you want, and whenever you want&#8212;no matter who gets hurt.  C&#8217;mon all you &#8220;personal responsibility&#8221; East Tennessee Republicans who will thoughtlessly vote for John McCain simply because of Parson Brownlow, let&#8217;s hear it.  How about a rousing, &#8221; I should be able to smoke in any restaurant. They&#8217;ve taken my freedom away.&#8221;</p>
<p>No they haven&#8217;t.  They have informed you that you do not live in an isolated mounatin valley.  You live around other people.  You have a personal responsibility to think not just about yourself but also about your elbow-to-elbow neighbors who would like to avoid cancer.</p>
<p>For example, I should be able to smoke in restaurants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2334</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2334</guid>
		<description>It's hard to be very disappointed; considering the beating that womens' rights to safe abortion have taken in recent years, is it so surprising this ineffective organization would endorse a candidate who voted "present" every time he had a chance to make a stand for  a woman's right to abortion in Illinois?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to be very disappointed; considering the beating that womens&#8217; rights to safe abortion have taken in recent years, is it so surprising this ineffective organization would endorse a candidate who voted &#8220;present&#8221; every time he had a chance to make a stand for  a woman&#8217;s right to abortion in Illinois?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>In other news, Obama reaches out to evangelicals.

I don't think this is going to help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news, Obama reaches out to evangelicals.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is going to help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2332</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2332</guid>
		<description>"Doug, do you have a link to data to back that up?"

http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=4798314

As noted, the racial makeup of the electorates themselves played a major role. Blacks accounted for 34 percent of North Carolina voters and 91 percent of them supported Obama. Against that voting bloc Clinton would have needed 70 percent of non-black voters; she fell well short, with 59 percent.  Obama also won nine in 10 blacks in Indiana. They accounted for 18 percent of voters there – far fewer than in North Carolina, but a record nonetheless for Indiana, surpassing 15 percent in 1988.

race and age:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/22/pennsylvania-exit-polls-p_n_98069.html
(Pennsylvania primary)
white 18-29 53-47 clinton
white 30-44 53-47 clinton
white 45-59 59-41 clinton
blacks 92-8 obama

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226001/
(Ohio primary)

Category	% Total	Clinton	Obama
White	                76	64	34
Black	                 18	 13	 87
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225975
Georgia

Race
Category	% Total	Clinton	Edwards	Obama
White	               43	53	4	43
Black           	51	 11	 0	 88

92% may be a LITTLE high, but only by a couple of percent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Doug, do you have a link to data to back that up?&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=4798314" rel="nofollow">http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=4798314</a></p>
<p>As noted, the racial makeup of the electorates themselves played a major role. Blacks accounted for 34 percent of North Carolina voters and 91 percent of them supported Obama. Against that voting bloc Clinton would have needed 70 percent of non-black voters; she fell well short, with 59 percent.  Obama also won nine in 10 blacks in Indiana. They accounted for 18 percent of voters there – far fewer than in North Carolina, but a record nonetheless for Indiana, surpassing 15 percent in 1988.</p>
<p>race and age:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/22/pennsylvania-exit-polls-p_n_98069.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/22/pennsylvania-exit-polls-p_n_98069.html</a><br />
(Pennsylvania primary)<br />
white 18-29 53-47 clinton<br />
white 30-44 53-47 clinton<br />
white 45-59 59-41 clinton<br />
blacks 92-8 obama</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226001/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21226001/</a><br />
(Ohio primary)</p>
<p>Category	% Total	Clinton	Obama<br />
White	                76	64	34<br />
Black	                 18	 13	 87<br />
<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225975" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21225975</a><br />
Georgia</p>
<p>Race<br />
Category	% Total	Clinton	Edwards	Obama<br />
White	               43	53	4	43<br />
Black           	51	 11	 0	 88</p>
<p>92% may be a LITTLE high, but only by a couple of percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikey NTH</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2331</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikey NTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2331</guid>
		<description>Pretty smart to wait until you know who the nominee is likely to be.  Saves all that 'taking back your word' stuff and keeps you out of the intra-party scrum for the most part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty smart to wait until you know who the nominee is likely to be.  Saves all that &#8216;taking back your word&#8217; stuff and keeps you out of the intra-party scrum for the most part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tookie</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2330</link>
		<dc:creator>Tookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2330</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://futurist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/12/a-picture-is-wo.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;This funny picture should be shown to all radical feminists.  It will really put them in their place. &lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://futurist.typepad.com/my_weblog/2006/12/a-picture-is-wo.html" rel="nofollow">This funny picture should be shown to all radical feminists.  It will really put them in their place. </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2328</guid>
		<description>It could also be that the "feminists" movement was never really "feminist" at all in that it was more concerned about larger leftist politics than it ever was about women's rights.  Looked at in that light there nothing at all surprising that they would endorse a far leftist candidate at the expense of the strongest female pro choice contender in history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could also be that the &#8220;feminists&#8221; movement was never really &#8220;feminist&#8221; at all in that it was more concerned about larger leftist politics than it ever was about women&#8217;s rights.  Looked at in that light there nothing at all surprising that they would endorse a far leftist candidate at the expense of the strongest female pro choice contender in history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2327</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2327</guid>
		<description>Phew.  For a minute there, I thought my husband had gone completely insane.  Glad that wasn't him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phew.  For a minute there, I thought my husband had gone completely insane.  Glad that wasn&#8217;t him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug McCaughan</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2326</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug McCaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2326</guid>
		<description>Ronnie Golden, Can you support your statement?

Doug, do you have a link to data to back that up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronnie Golden, Can you support your statement?</p>
<p>Doug, do you have a link to data to back that up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2324</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2324</guid>
		<description>No, not all blacks are voting for Obama, only 92% of them. The rest were probably mistakes by the exit poll workers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, not all blacks are voting for Obama, only 92% of them. The rest were probably mistakes by the exit poll workers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gemini</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2323</link>
		<dc:creator>gemini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2323</guid>
		<description>Lovely commenters you have here.

Pretty interesting that NARAL waited until it was clear who the nominee would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely commenters you have here.</p>
<p>Pretty interesting that NARAL waited until it was clear who the nominee would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie Golden</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie Golden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>I would not vote for Obama for dog catcher he does not care any thing for the USA. And any one that endorses him should have their head examed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not vote for Obama for dog catcher he does not care any thing for the USA. And any one that endorses him should have their head examed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: py</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>py</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>why does the pro-choice lobby HAVE to endorse Clinton?
all women are not voting for her and all blacks are not voting for Obama</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does the pro-choice lobby HAVE to endorse Clinton?<br />
all women are not voting for her and all blacks are not voting for Obama</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2317</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 18:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://knoxvilletalks.com/2008/05/14/the-post-feminist-future-is-now/#comment-2317</guid>
		<description>"Viable"??? Darlin' you just about made me spew my coffee all over the screen. If Shrillary is viable, then the sludge at the bottom of my garbage disposal is a gourmet meal in 7 courses. 

I am sure the baby-killing crew at NARAL is endorsing Barack BabyDaddy Obama only to avoid the wrath of the Democrat party and being called racist. Don't you know how this identity politics stuff works yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Viable&#8221;??? Darlin&#8217; you just about made me spew my coffee all over the screen. If Shrillary is viable, then the sludge at the bottom of my garbage disposal is a gourmet meal in 7 courses. </p>
<p>I am sure the baby-killing crew at NARAL is endorsing Barack BabyDaddy Obama only to avoid the wrath of the Democrat party and being called racist. Don&#8217;t you know how this identity politics stuff works yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
